Compare Companion Accessibility With Dated Evidence
Use the same tasks and evidence states for each service so missing access does not become an invented score.
This task records scoped evidence. It is not accessibility certification, legal advice or a universal result.
What this page owns
Compare companion accessibility with the same dated evidence fields and unknown state.
Begin with the named task and preserve the setup. Do not turn a product statement, automated scan or reachable page into proof that a person can complete the task.
Four steps, one documented result
- 01
Choose a fixed set of essential tasks and access methods.
- 02
Record available, barrier observed or not checked for every cell.
- 03
Separate vendor statements from dated observations.
- 04
Publish limitations before any summary or recommendation.
Make the observation reproducible
- Setup
- Device, operating system, browser, input method and assistive technology.
- Task
- Starting point, action and expected outcome in plain language.
- Result
- Pass, barrier observed or not checked — never a guessed score.
- Limit
- Do not rank services from automated scans alone. Unknown must remain different from pass or fail.
Keep the route separate from the evidence.
Candy AI is one adult companion service discussed here. The link below may earn us a commission. It does not change the method or create an accessibility endorsement.
Open Candy AI — sponsored